- From: Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:01:28 +0200
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 2013/10/04 23:13, David Singer wrote: > On Oct 4, 2013, at 6:10 , Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com> wrote: > [...] >> Are retarded business models that want to be on the web more important >> than the web's users ? W3C says yes. > > It just doesn't help to sling around insults like "retarded". "Retarded" is an actual word that means something. Please, it's like you've never heard this word outside of the context of a school playground. [..] >> EME is broken (100% of DRM so far breaks at some point), > > The goal is not to prevent all piracy all the time, but to sharply > reduce it. In that respect, it succeeds. I would prefer instead that the goal be a way to include people like me as clients of such services. By requiring control you alienate most users who understand what EME requires from its clients. [..] >> and mostly (because this goes against clear W3C guidelines), it allows >> "validated" websites to publish content that is not accessible to all. > > That's true today for all sorts of content. There are still websites > that only work with IE6, for example. 0% percent of the websites that work only with IE6 are "W3C Valid". -- Emmanuel Revah http://manurevah.com
Received on Saturday, 5 October 2013 11:01:58 UTC