- From: Matt Ivie <matt.ivie@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:53:30 -0600
- To: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>,piranna@gmail.com
- CC: 'Andreas Kuckartz' <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>,public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
What else can EME do? John Foliot <john@foliot.ca> wrote: >>Matt Ivie wrote: >>> >>> Being Free Software and being covered by a patent are two different >>> things. By confusing the two matters you're making more downstream >>> confusion as a result. We should think of copyright issues and >>patent >>> issues as they are: two separate issues. >> >>I can meet you there when you meet me at EME is not DRM :-) >> >>(Both are examples of separate issues that have significant linkages, >>and related downstream confusion...) >> >>Besides, we're talking about "Open" standards here, and bringing forth >>x264 without acknowledging the fact that the software still uses >>technology that is not "open" is, I believe relevant, if for no other >>reason than an illustration of how "Open" software can still use >>non-open standards/technologies (unless you are going to tell me that >>you can freely modify the H.264 codec at will, with no repercussions). >> >>JF -- Sent from my Replicant phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Visit replicant.us
Received on Saturday, 29 June 2013 02:54:19 UTC