- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:17:40 +0200
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>, Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>, "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>, Nikos Roussos <comzeradd@mozilla-community.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, "coordinators@igcaucus.org" <coordinators@igcaucus.org>
> I'm looking for common ground so I want to see if I understand your +1, > above. > > Can I interpret that to mean that you are supportive of a W3C spec which: > > Provides EME as a standard > Includes a statement of the form: "W3C prefers that content not be protected > with DRM systems, however, if a non-standard DRM solution is chosen, W3C > recommends that EME be used as a common, open means to access the DRM > system." > > ? > My fault by not being more explicit, I would be supportive for the later statement, since although I'm (and will always be) against any DRM solution (standard or not), as you said this is a little step to look for a common ground. Anyway, I must to say that this is just my oppinion and I don't represent to anybody except myself... -- "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo Unix." – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 22:18:32 UTC