- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:28:20 -0400
- To: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org List" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>, coordinators@igcaucus.org
Wendy Seltzer [2013-06-20T23:15]: > For those who don't like DRM, recognizing that W3C likely doesn't have > the leverage to kill it, should we try to slow it down or open it up? > Are there ways we can usefully make the restrictions less onerous > without merely driving their proponents elsewhere? We will not kill it (the same way the RF policy didn't kill patents) BUT what I want is a system which creates more business opportunities for the infrastructure: 1. rights language at the HTML level (with JS API to access those) [know what is the content, who is the content owner, how to reach] 2. non destructive watermarking technologies for all contents. [traceability of the content] 3. micro web payment system in the browser. [enabling business, and frictionless call to action] On the other hand if the proponent of DRMs persist, encourage browser implementers to have low level APIs so people can create a "Record" button for the DRMed piece. -- Karl Dubost http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 03:28:24 UTC