- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:41:46 +0300
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org, timbl@w3.org
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > To clarify, the HTML WG Draft Charter neither mentions DRM or EME. All that > it states is that content protection is in scope for the HTML Working Group. It's unclear to me what distinction the W3C intends to make between the terms "content protection" and "DRM". To illustrate the distinction, could you, please, give an example of something that constitutes "content protection" for digital content but does not constitute "DRM"? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@hsivonen.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Sunday, 16 June 2013 18:42:14 UTC