- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:44:58 -0400
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- CC: W3C DRM/EME Mailing List <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
On 6/14/2013 8:32 AM, Karl Dubost wrote: > Jeff Jaffe [2013-06-14T08:26]: >> I am not sure why you think my statement is misleading. >> Reference [2] is indeed the relevant message. It was sent by Philippe after Philippe asked Tim whether or not this was in scope - and Tim said that it was. > Because no where there is a message signed by the W3C Director or in the name of the W3C Director. > There are messages from W3C Team (through Philippe) > I'm also being very careful of not mixing Tim Berners Lee and the W3C Director, aka Person vs Role. It's usually important. When Philippe asked Tim whether it was in scope, he asked him in his role as Director. Tim also read my blog post and did not contest my statement that the W3C Director has established that work on content protection is in scope. I believe you are looking for some distinction that does not exist. > >
Received on Friday, 14 June 2013 12:45:01 UTC