- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:36:43 -0400
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- Cc: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>, public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Henri Sivonen [2013-06-14T02:58]: > In that case, the compliance rules > of the DRM applied to the soundtrack become accessibility-relevant. It's not a property of DRM, it is a consequence which can happen in other circumstances with any obfuscation systems, even a simple base64 or rot13. It's why I'm saying it's unrelated. It's not a very good axis of discussion. I agree with you that it makes it a lot of easier to hinder access but the same way for people with accessibility issues or not, the people with non technical competences, the people with historical/archival needs, etc. These are the well-known social issues of DRMs, and it's why I'm against them. -- Karl Dubost http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Friday, 14 June 2013 09:36:51 UTC