- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:13:28 -0400
- To: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- CC: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 6/3/2013 7:28 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > Jeff Jaffe: >> While we have the practice of only providing Recommendations that are >> implementable in open source, we haven't said that each Recommendation >> must be implementable in every open source license that's out there. >> Hence we've not said that every Recommendation must be implementable in >> (e.g.) GPL. > I suppose that this question never came up before EME. Maybe I am wrong, > but I am not aware of any currently existing W3C Recommendation (or any > other W3C document) which is not implementable in GPL3 or AGPL3. > >> When this last came up > How did that come up ? In another context than EME ? A few weeks ago in the restricted-media mailing list. > >> That's not to take a position on whether we should change our policy to >> insist that RECs be implementable in every open source license. But that >> would be a new policy for W3C. > Many people probably took such an unwritten policy for granted. > > Cheers, > Andreas
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 23:13:35 UTC