- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:35:11 +0100
- To: piranna@gmail.com
- Cc: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, public-restrictedmedia@w3.org, Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>
On Jul 12, 2013, at 18:34 , piranna@gmail.com wrote: > > One way to interpret this remark is that W3C should not have accepted the "content protection" requirement of the Web and TV Interest Group - which of course has been well debated on this list. > > > And we didn't get consensus, in fact it seems too me that both positions has got more radicalized with stronger arguments, by the way... This it's something that should be noticed and taken in account… No, actually, I see some real exchange of at least understanding, and a pretty good feeling we'd like to do better. I don't agree it's a polar discussion. David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2013 10:35:48 UTC