- From: cobaco <cobaco@freemen.be>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:31:43 +0200
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 2013-08-20 10:46 Mark Watson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:43 AM, cobaco <cobaco@freemen.be> wrote: > > On 2013-08-20 09:45 David Singer wrote: > > > On Aug 20, 2013, at 5:11 , Rick <graham.rick@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm sorry, then I misunderstood, and I still don't understand what the > > > relationship is between EME, and the problem of the extent you can be > > > monitored/tracked online. > > > > > > > It seems that if you live in the US, you can get a "Security Letter" > > > > that > > > > > > you must comply with and discuss with no one or you spend 5 years in > > > > jail. Do not pass go, do not collect $200.00 > > > > > > And the relevance to this EME discussion is…? > > > > in as far as there is any relevance it would be that you can't trust black > > boxes, especially from US companies (who might be forced with a national > > security letter), and CDM's are black boxes > > So are plugins. What's the difference ? none, which is why EME is a red herring solving nothing, it's posturing to get the black box stamped 'standards-based' -- Cheers, cobaco
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 21:31:44 UTC