- From: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:53:55 -0400
- To: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, Podjarny, Guy <gpodjarn@akamai.com>, Attiks <attiks@gmail.com>
- Cc: John Albin Wilkins <john@albin.net>, Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>, Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com>, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>, Christopher Schmitt <schmitt@christopher.org>, "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
On September 23, 2014 at 12:24:54 PM, Yoav Weiss (yoav@yoav.ws) wrote: > > Maybe the best compromise is the LQIP technique you were advocating > a while back - add the src with a very low quality image, with old > browsers double downloading it (but since it's very small, the > damage is minimal), and noscript users on old browsers get a low > quality image, which is better than nothing. I'm with Odin. The fallback is always "src". I understand it's a business decision to support responsive images on sites through a polyfill like picturefill, but the "responsible" thing to do is to degrade gracefully just using "src" (no need for a polyfill at all).
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 19:54:22 UTC