- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:59:55 -0700
- To: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
- Cc: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>, "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> wrote: > Hey Greg, > > If the media change is only enough so that it would impact which image the > browser would choose inside a single source-set (e.g. example 7), that is > entirely UA defined. *All* aspects of source choosing are left UA-defined intentionally, so they can make the best choice based on whatever information and heuristics they choose to adopt. The spec just defines how to extract the information from the elements, and when to perform the first choosing/loading. Which source the UA chooses is intended to be a quality-of-implementation issue. It's assumed that they'll make reasonable choices at first, and anything else is gravy. If a UA is making bad choices, it's intended to be dealt with by just filing a bug against them. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2014 22:00:42 UTC