W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Request for feedback

From: Cory Brown <oh.wise.man@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 15:17:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKxo9DqRAGX+-i_hUNOc7bJOZXGgBc=BAOv-U0grULm4B15Zug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: public-respimg@w3.org
I think that would be great. I definitely want to make sure it addresses
everything it needs to so what ever you want to throw at it is more than
welcome.

Cory


On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> Hi Cory,
>
> On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 at 14:50, Cory Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've built a couple polyfills for the picture element at National
> Geographic (one is actually in use) and we'd like to add them to the
> Responsive Images Community Group wiki as polyfill examples. Before we do
> that though, we'd like to make sure they are as accurate as they can be.
> There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches we've used and
> we'd love to get these hardened so they can be used more widely and help to
> pave this cow path a little more. If you're interested, please send pull
> requests or open bugs on these in GitHub.
> >
>
>
> After discussing with a few people on IRC, it would be really great if we
> could adopt x-picture as the official RICG solution - that we then continue
> to build on. This would help us address recommendation 3 from the W3C's TAG:
>
>
> https://github.com/w3ctag/extending-html-responsibly/blob/master/RICG-recs/ricg.md#tag-recommendations
>
> It could mean assigning more resources from the CG to it (including making
> sure it matches the spec + a test suite).
>
> WDTY?
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcos
>
> --
> Marcos Caceres
>
>
>
>


-- 
Cory Brown
Received on Saturday, 7 September 2013 19:18:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:12:40 UTC