W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > October 2013

Re: JPEG 2000 (was: Multiple image files?)

From: Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CADQU=pOA86sLodgjEwejFo50vr1ACY3LLOWHs5yJLYYe9Ge+-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eduardo Marques <ebmarques@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
This seems like a question for the browser vendors (John? Tab?). I'm
assuming JPEG 2000 has been considered. What was the result of that
consideration?


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Eduardo Marques <ebmarques@gmail.com>wrote:

> IMO, those are ***THE*** keywords for the solution we need(!!!):
>
> > With every client requesting just the bytes it needs from the full-res
> source file.
>
> Simple as that. Not less, not more than that.
> The challenge is: How to do that?
>
>
>
> From: lists@ericportis [mailto:lists@ericportis.com]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 18 de outubro de 2013 16:33
> To: Frédéric Kayser
> Cc: public-respimg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: JPEG 2000 (was: Multiple image files?)
> ...
> With every client requesting just the bytes it needs from the full-res
> source file.
> ...
>
>
>


-- 
+1 (503) 290-1090 o | +1 (503) 502-7211 m | http://cloudfour.com
Received on Sunday, 20 October 2013 19:10:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:12:40 UTC