W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > October 2013

Re: srcN - Alternative to picture and srcset

From: Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 20:39:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CADQU=pPXXGCb+NJD1NjBBhnq1Bk-1EU7jDA9zKEKmOXiQSowMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> The whole point of that is that you *don't* pair it off.  You're not
> defining pairs, you're defining a line with breakpoints on it and
> image sizes between/around them.  That's what my image attempted to
> illustrate, though I think I need to tweak it a bit to make it even
> clearer.  Pairing them requires you to remember whether the viewport
> size is a min or a max, which is the most confusing part of the
> current extended srcset syntax, and which I was trying to avoid.


Oh, I didn't get that at all. What happens right at the breakpoints?
Viewport exactly equals 30em or 70em in your example?



-- 
+1 (503) 290-1090 o | +1 (503) 502-7211 m | http://cloudfour.com
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 03:40:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:12:40 UTC