W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [public-respimg] <none>

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:33:14 +0100
To: Mohsen Nabiloo Azimi <msnazi@gmail.com>
Cc: public-respimg@w3.org
Message-ID: <CB979750970142288DC61F1BC65D03EF@marcosc.com>



On Thursday, June 27, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Mohsen Nabiloo Azimi wrote:

> For example, if an image is 2000 by 2000 pixels, but it's resized to 200
> by 200 pixels, browser would not download whole image and scale it down.
> It will actually just download enough pixels to cover the area that
> image is covering. And likewise, if image is sized to 300 by 300 pixels
> browser would download that much "pixels".
> 
> 
> Have anybody thought about this before?
See:
http://calendar.perfplanet.com/2012/progressive-jpegs-a-new-best-practice/
http://blog.yoav.ws/2012/05/Responsive-image-format
http://opensores.za.net/2012/responsive-images/

Hope that helps! 
-- 

Marcos Caceres 
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 14:33:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:12:39 UTC