W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: handle ISSUE-207 responsive-images consistently with Plan 2014

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:15:18 +0000
To: David Demaree <ddemaree@adobe.com>
Cc: "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FDFD800F79CD4F67B2563D9EC2DD6645@marcosc.com>

Hi David,  

On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 at 3:23 PM, David Demaree wrote:

> Does this preclude introducing the picture element in the future?

Absolutely not. We can continue to evolve picture until we get some browser vendor buy-in. 

> I feel there's definitely a use case for both picture and img@srcset, and if there's some support behind fast-tracking the latter that seems like a good thing for responsive images, so long as it's not blocking progress on all the other use cases this group is advocating for.
Agreed. I feel the same.  
> Are there any issues with the particular img@srcset spec they want to move forward with?
> 

Wilto, Yoav, and I will be on the HTMLWG teleconf this thursday (tomorrow). Hopefully we will get some clarity. 

-- 
Marcos Caceres
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2013 18:15:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 January 2013 18:15:49 GMT