- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:11:21 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, public-html-admin@w3.org, public-respimg@w3.org
On 06/02/2013 23:39 , Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > I'm not sure if you saw this on the thread about the picture element > CfC: after understanding that the two specifications are not competing > with each other but are meant to complete each other to cover the > responsive images use cases, I was left to wonder why we have two > separate specifications. There's still some open discussion about which use cases need to be tackled, and how. > Would be able to work with picture element proponents to come up with > one specification to cover a broader range of the user cases? I think that's precisely the plan! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 09:11:34 UTC