- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:41:49 +0200
- To: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
- Cc: Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>, Peter Winnberg <peter.winnberg@gmail.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
Adrian Roselli, Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:14:46 +0000: > I'd rather see <picture>'s fallback rely on the existing momentum > <img> has with its @alt -- just rely on <img> to be the fallback both > for the alternate image and the @alt text. Leave @alt off <picture> > altogether. Just wanted to point out that what Adrian proposes here - <img> as the element which takes care of the alternative text - is a variant (a subset) of what Steve said: alternative text should be provided via markup rather than via an attribute on the picture element. If we say that <picture> should have img role, then we imply that alternative text should be provided via an attribute. This means that AT will pick the alternative text from the img element, as long as they don't support picture. Fine. But it also means that at the moment when picture support is enabled, they will suddenly start to take the alternative text from another element - picture. This would work fine as long as authors really do offer both - and the same content in both. But it also means that, in other cases, the users will get a different experience, based on whether the UA/AT supports - or not - the picture element. -- leif h silli
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 20:42:22 UTC