W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: WebP, anyone using it?

From: Jin Kim <jinkim@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:03:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CACH1+ahiF-KZfzZsTvqGZnRoLKU081TF+xtOJC0iGUgB+n_WXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
Cc: Peter Gasston <pgasston@gmail.com>, Kevin Suttle <kevin@kevinsuttle.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, public-respimg@w3.org
I agree w/ François.  I think RespImg spec should be image format neutral..

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:56 AM, François REMY
<fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Supporting WebP from Google while not supporting JPEG-XR from Microsoft
> seems rather difficult to hold position. Based on most tests I’ve been able
> to read, JPEG-XR and WebP perform almost similarly (slight win for WebP on
> average), but JPEG-XR is much faster to decode, making it better suited for
> the web context. Behind that, you get the usual MS vs GOOG debate as none of
> the two want to implement the other's format.
>
> By the way, I don't really grasp why the RespIMG spec should talk about
> image formats. This is very controversial and could create a lot of high N/S
> debates unrelated to the core issue (which is: responsive image).
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 07:06:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 16 October 2012 07:07:01 GMT