- From: Jin Kim <jinkim@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:03:58 -0400
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: Peter Gasston <pgasston@gmail.com>, Kevin Suttle <kevin@kevinsuttle.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, public-respimg@w3.org
I agree w/ François. I think RespImg spec should be image format neutral.. On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:56 AM, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Supporting WebP from Google while not supporting JPEG-XR from Microsoft > seems rather difficult to hold position. Based on most tests I’ve been able > to read, JPEG-XR and WebP perform almost similarly (slight win for WebP on > average), but JPEG-XR is much faster to decode, making it better suited for > the web context. Behind that, you get the usual MS vs GOOG debate as none of > the two want to implement the other's format. > > By the way, I don't really grasp why the RespIMG spec should talk about > image formats. This is very controversial and could create a lot of high N/S > debates unrelated to the core issue (which is: responsive image). >
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 07:06:45 UTC