W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > May 2012

Shouldn't we be defining content, not context? [via Responsive Images Community Group]

From: Jacob Mather <jmather@itsmajax.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:22:52 +0000
To: public-respimg@w3.org
Message-ID: <74a242dbed8824a021a4082cc459ca01@www.w3.org>
One of the points that I have seen raised against Matt's most recent suggestion
involving templates has stuck a major chord with me: indirection. A Warning What
I'm about to suggest seems quite "off the wall" in relation to what has been
discussed prior to now. I believe some of this has already been talked about,
but [...]



----------

This post sent on Responsive Images Community Group



'Shouldn't we be defining content, not context?'

http://www.w3.org/community/respimg/2012/05/16/shouldnt-we-be-defining-content-not-context/



Learn more about the Responsive Images Community Group: 

http://www.w3.org/community/respimg
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 05:41:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 19 May 2012 05:41:13 GMT