Re: Should we use the interface names for the values of .termType? from Ruben Verborgh on 2016-05-06 (public-rdfjs@w3.org from May 2016)

From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 09:55:02 +0200
To: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
Cc: "public-rdfjs@w3.org" <public-rdfjs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3F4E7EF6-8D62-4D7B-B383-4D9230AE14AC@ugent.be>

Hi all,

> literals have other properties than value and
> .valueType would not cover this.

I personally don't find this a problem.

> The
> RDF-Interfaces spec [3] uses that approach and rdf-ext implements it
> that way.

These should not be arguments IMHO;
we are not following that spec on purpose,
and implementations can be changed.

Best,

Ruben

Received on Friday, 6 May 2016 07:57:55 UTC