- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:34:44 +0100
- To: RDF-JS <public-rdfjs@w3.org>
Dear all, On Gitter and during the meetings, there is an ongoing discussion on whether the "thing" that can be a triple subject, predicate, or object should be referred to as "IRI" or "NamedNode" in the library. I welcome you to add your arguments here: https://github.com/rdfjs/representation-task-force/wiki/NamedNode Best, Ruben PS I have added an argument myself in favor of IRI: https://github.com/rdfjs/representation-task-force/wiki/NamedNode#a-usage-based-argument-for-iri in which I argue that we are manipulating concrete manifestations of triples (IRIs, literals, blank node labels), not the conceptual relations they represent (named nodes, literals, blank nodes). Feedback welcome!
Received on Friday, 25 March 2016 16:35:08 UTC