Re: representing deserialized RDF - N3, JSON-LD, RDFa, XML/RDF

On 11.12.13 14:02, Ruben Verborgh wrote:

>> I think it's much easier to write the necessary adapters than
>> trying to come up with a "compromise" everybody agrees with.

> Sure; as far as I understood, the purpose is to agree on some common
>  format X, so that everybody writes adapters for their own library 
> from and to X. That way, we don't end up needing an adapters per 
> library for each other used library. But in some case, for 
> performance, that might just be required.

Unless someone comes up with a good reason against I would vote for
JSON-LD then.

regards

Adrian


-- 
Adrian Gschwend
@ netlabs.org

ktk [a t] netlabs.org
-------
Open Source Project
http://www.netlabs.org