- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:22:40 +0100
- To: gig.graham@ontomatica.com
- CC: public-rdfa@w3.org
On 01/28/2014 07:12 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > On Jan 20, 2014, at 4:59 AM, <gig.graham@ontomatica.com > <mailto:gig.graham@ontomatica.com>> wrote: > >> I am writing to verify that I am using schema.org <http://schema.org> >> correctly in an RDFa document. >> I also would like to verify that the document type - host language >> specification is correct for RDFa 1.1. >> Rather than splashing the document here, I've posted to pastebin. >> The URL is: >> http://pastebin.com/v0Y2Cf3t >> I have validated the document with: >> http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/Validator.html#distill_by_upload >> and: >> http://validator.w3.org/ >> but hope to learn the reaction by and advice from human experts. >> Thank you in advance for assistance. >> /g > > You might try http://linter.structured-data.org, which can help you > verify what your markup means. Also, google's webmaster tools. I would also add: http://rdfa.info/play/ which draws nice tree representation of your data :)
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 21:22:16 UTC