W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > October 2012

Re: prefix with relative IRI

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 22:36:22 -0400
Message-ID: <50835FA6.3010009@digitalbazaar.com>
To: Peter Danielsen <wiscal@gmail.com>
CC: public-rdfa@w3.org
On 10/11/2012 01:47 PM, Peter Danielsen wrote:
> I get different results for the triples I get back from different 
> RDFa processors.  If the document is at 
> http://www.example.com/index.html, one RDFa processor will say that 
> the object's IRI is "overview.html#o1", and the other will say its 
> "http://www.example.com/overview.html#o1". My expectation is that 
> it's the latter, the absolute IRI, based on the start of 7.4:

Peter, your expectation is correct. The result should be an absolute IRI
resolving the relative IRI against the document base. Could you please
let us know which processor is in error?

We should add a test case for this issue as well.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power
http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2012 02:36:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:09 UTC