W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > December 2012

Re: RDFa parser implementation proposal

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:59:41 -0500
To: Lev Khomich <levkhomich@gmail.com>
CC: Public RDFa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F182635D-92AB-41A2-BD66-E5DD4606AFBC@greggkellogg.net>
All set up.

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Lev Khomich <levkhomich@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you for your corrections. I've updated DOAP and added some FOAF triples.
> Pull request is ready to be reviewed.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Lev Khomich <levkhomich@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Sure, it would be great. Atm, DOAP description provided as RDFa at endpoint demo page.
> > Should I provide it in other format?
> 
> No, that page should be just fine. The processor definition goes here: https://github.com/rdfa/rdfa-website/blob/master/processors.json, you just need "endpoint" and "doap" properties. It does make use of doap:developer, though, so you might want to add that in addition to doap:maintainer. But actually, that should reference a FOAF record, so you may also need to assert the following:
> 
> <https://github.com/levkhomich> a foaf:Person;
>   foaf:name "Lev Khomich";
>   foaf:homepage <https://github.com/levkhomich> .
> 
> Or, something similar. You can just do that in the DOAP description itself, as I don't think GitHub asserts either FOAF or DOAP (it would be nice if they did, though).
> 
> Gregg
> 
> > Also, I can make pull request with corresponding changes.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Lev Khomich
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> > That's great! Lev, would you mind if we add a processor endpoint to the RDFa test suite? We'll be generating a new EARL report for HTML+RDFa 1.1 after an LC transition. To be included, this requires a DOAP description of the document, either included in the repo, or referenced from your processor description.
> >
> > Gregg Kellogg
> > gregg@greggkellogg.net
> >
> > On Dec 18, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > FYI, new java RDFa parser which passes 100% of the RDFa tests: http://semarglproject.org/
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Lev Khomich <levkhomich@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:37 AM
> > > Subject: RDFa parser implementation proposal
> > > To: any23-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > As I see at http://rdfa.info/test-suite Any23 passes near 50% of RDFa tests
> > > and project has 4+ related tickets in issue tracker.
> > >
> > > I've implemented such parser in java. It fully supports all related W3C
> > > specifications for both html4, html5, xhtml, xml and svg. It also supports
> > > all
> > > optionals such as role attribute, vocabulary expansion and processor graph
> > > reporting.
> > >
> > > If you are interested, I will be happy to provide Any23 integration.
> > > You can try demo at http://demo.semarglproject.org or test
> > > standard conformance at http://rdfa.inf/test-suite
> > > (with processor url http://demo.semarglproject.org/process?uri= specified).
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Lev Khomich
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steph.
> >
> >
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 23:00:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:09 UTC