W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [Fwd: [Bug 11169] New: HTML+RDFa - Infer @content from @datetime on time tag]

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:33:17 +0000
To: public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>, public-rdfa-wg <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1288794798.20489.83.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk>
Bother! This was meant for public-rdfa-wg...

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:50 +0000, Toby Inkster wrote:
> Almost missed this. This is a bug report / feature request against HTML
> +RDFa on the HTMLWG issue tracker. We might want to consider it as input
> to the RDFaWG too.
> 
> email message attachment, "Forwarded message — [Bug 11169] New: HTML
> +RDFa - Infer @content from @datetime on time tag"
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
> > To: public-html@w3.org
> > Subject: [Bug 11169] New: HTML+RDFa - Infer @content from @datetime
> > on time tag
> > Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:53:18 +0000
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11169
> > 
> >            Summary: HTML+RDFa - Infer @content from @datetime on time tag
> >            Product: HTML WG
> >            Version: unspecified
> >           Platform: All
> >         OS/Version: All
> >             Status: NEW
> >           Severity: normal
> >           Priority: P2
> >          Component: HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny)
> >         AssignedTo: msporny@digitalbazaar.com
> >         ReportedBy: waters.boyd@gmail.com
> >          QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
> >                 CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
> >                     public-html@w3.org, msporny@digitalbazaar.com
> > 
> > 
> > Consider this markup:
> > 
> > <body prefix="dc: http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
> > <time datetime="2010-10-29T15:48:11" property="dc:modified" pubdate>October
> > 29th 2010 at 11:48 AM</time>
> > <time datetime="2010-10-29T15:36:24" property="dc:created">October 29th 2010 at
> > 11:36 AM</time>
> > </body>
> > 
> > I would like the @content attribute to be inferred from the time's @datetime.
> > 
> > In the spec right now it seems that the @content attribute will get the text
> > contents of the time tag, in this case "October 29th 2010 at 11:48 AM". Which
> > is invalid.
> > 
> > Or perhaps the markup is invalid, because the @content is missing.
> > 
> > But it SHOULD be an error to say something like
> > <time datetime="2010-10-29T15:48:11" property="dc:modified"
> > content="2007-01-01">
> > 
> > That's valid markup -- it's possible to set @content to any valid W3 date value
> > -- but what are the semantics?
> > 
> > 
> > (I have not participated in semantic web activity in about 7 years, and my
> > specification-reading skills have blown away. So perhaps the current draft
> > HTML+RDFa spec already has this. But I don't think so.)
> > 


-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 14:34:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:07 UTC