W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > November 2010

[Fwd: [Bug 11169] New: HTML+RDFa - Infer @content from @datetime on time tag]

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:50:27 +0000
To: public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1288792227.20489.81.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk>
Almost missed this. This is a bug report / feature request against HTML
+RDFa on the HTMLWG issue tracker. We might want to consider it as input
to the RDFaWG too.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>

attached mail follows:


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11169

           Summary: HTML+RDFa - Infer @content from @datetime on time tag
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny)
        AssignedTo: msporny@digitalbazaar.com
        ReportedBy: waters.boyd@gmail.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org, msporny@digitalbazaar.com


Consider this markup:

<body prefix="dc: http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<time datetime="2010-10-29T15:48:11" property="dc:modified" pubdate>October
29th 2010 at 11:48 AM</time>
<time datetime="2010-10-29T15:36:24" property="dc:created">October 29th 2010 at
11:36 AM</time>
</body>

I would like the @content attribute to be inferred from the time's @datetime.

In the spec right now it seems that the @content attribute will get the text
contents of the time tag, in this case "October 29th 2010 at 11:48 AM". Which
is invalid.

Or perhaps the markup is invalid, because the @content is missing.

But it SHOULD be an error to say something like
<time datetime="2010-10-29T15:48:11" property="dc:modified"
content="2007-01-01">

That's valid markup -- it's possible to set @content to any valid W3 date value
-- but what are the semantics?


(I have not participated in semantic web activity in about 7 years, and my
specification-reading skills have blown away. So perhaps the current draft
HTML+RDFa spec already has this. But I don't think so.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 13:51:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:07 UTC