W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > November 2010

Re: 'easier in rdfa' writeup on description multiple classes/properties

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:54:35 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=k7NtKe_v7Sa=xu+ugd3H8rJEk=NX+DtbZyBks@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
That's a great article, Dan.

It reminds me of some SKOS vocabularies I created using RDFa; they
too, were easier to write, and also much easier to read.

By the way, the main way that RDFa 1.1 changes the landscape is
through the ability to dissolve your CURIEs into terms (via profiles),
or use the default vocabulary feature. My guess is that these features
wouldn't really help advanced users, and might even make things
confusing when it comes to the 'multiple ontology' scenario you
describe.

Regards,

Mark

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I've just written up some notes on RDF (1.0) and how it improves on
> RDF/XML when you want to say a thing is in several classes, or that
> two things are linked by several properties.
>
> http://danbri.org/words/2010/11/02/572
>
> I didn't say anything about RDFa 1.1 as I'm pretty ignorant of the
> current design. I'd be happy if anyone can flesh out how these things
> look in 1.1...
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 12:55:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:07 UTC