- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:55:12 -0600
- To: public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Looks like my messages to public-rdfa-wg are getting held for moderation; let's try public-rdfa... Please confirm receipt, RDFa folks. On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 12:40 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > RDFa WG folks, > > Ever since the launch of gears, I've been wondering if/how we > could use it for client-side RDF storage, a la tabulator. > I set it aside as a research interest... > > Then the other day, I discovered* that Zotero uses the tabulator RDF > store... and the TAG is taking a look at WebApps architecture** > > I had other stuff to do at the time, but I didn't want it > to fall on the floor, so I stuck it on my TAG todo list: > > ACTION-392 on Dan Connolly: Look into using new client side storage APIs > as an RDFa or tabulator data store > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/392 > > Has anybody in the RDFa WG given this a thought? > > I don't see anything close in your issues list. > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues > > If you added this to your issues list, I could maybe cross it off > my TAG todo list. > > > ** Review client-side storage API’s > ashok malhotra Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:31:52 -0800 > <http://www.w3.org/mid/4B8402F8.7080305@oracle.com> > > > * FYI: Zotero uses tabulator's RDF-handling .js code > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-ui/2010Feb/0009.html > > > p.s. I'm not sure whether I should be writing to > public-rdfa@w3.org or public-rdfa-wg@w3.org. Would you please > add something to the archive cover pages to explain their relationship? > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/ > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa/ > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 19:55:14 UTC