- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:41:50 +0200
- To: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
- Cc: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
On 14 Jun 2010, at 17:24, Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com> wrote: > On 14/06/10 16:05, Toby Inkster wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:26:30 +0100 >> Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com> wrote: >> >>> * (Finally) support overlapping literals. No one noticed this didn't >>> work! >> >> This reminds me. ODF has an interesting construction which can be >> thought of like this: >> >> <x property="ex:p1">Foo<y property="ex:p2">Bar</x>Baz</y> >> >> So you'd get these triples: >> >> <> ex:p1 "FooBar" ; >> ex:p2 "BarBaz" . >> >> It uses proper XML though, with empty elements to mark the start and >> end of the literals. >> >> Now, those are overlapping literals! >> >> I do plan on adding support at some stage... >> > > Dear lord, we need Jeni's advice on this. Creole support in RDFa? [1] > Dimly remembering some papers from that sgml/xml conf series, the scholarly/thoughtful one, on 'overlapping markup'. Am on an iphone on a plane and hence excuse myself from googling... Dan > Damian > > [1] <http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/taxonomy/term/9> >
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 15:41:32 UTC