- From: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:24:12 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
On 14/06/10 16:05, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:26:30 +0100 > Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com> wrote: > >> * (Finally) support overlapping literals. No one noticed this didn't >> work! > > This reminds me. ODF has an interesting construction which can be > thought of like this: > > <x property="ex:p1">Foo<y property="ex:p2">Bar</x>Baz</y> > > So you'd get these triples: > > <> ex:p1 "FooBar" ; > ex:p2 "BarBaz" . > > It uses proper XML though, with empty elements to mark the start and > end of the literals. > > Now, those are overlapping literals! > > I do plan on adding support at some stage... > Dear lord, we need Jeni's advice on this. Creole support in RDFa? [1] Damian [1] <http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/taxonomy/term/9>
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 15:24:58 UTC