W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > July 2010

OASIS ODF 1.2 Public Review

From: <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:51:23 -0400
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdfa@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFDBD05430.041FFD77-ON8525776E.005F2DAA-8525776E.0061C4FF@lotus.com>
==== Rob's Friendly Message from the OASIS ODF TC ====

I'd like to make a quick note that OASIS OpenDocument Format 1.2 is now 
out for public review, through September 6th.

The announcement is here:  
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201007/msg00004.html

Of particular interest should be the RDFa and RDF/XML support introduced 
in ODF 1.2.

As you may know, an ODF document is ZIP package containing multiple 
resources, typically including at least a content.xml (the contents and 
structure of a document) and a styles.xml (the style definitions).  You 
can think of these as analogues to an HTML and CSS file.

ODF 1.2 defines a subset of RDFa for use in annotating elements in 
content.xml and styles.xml: @about, @property, @datatype and @content.  We 
call this "in-content metadata".  This subset was chosen based on 
implementor feedback on what would be easiest to integrate into existing 
word processors.

We also support RDF/XML, where this metadata is stored as a separate XML 
doc in the ZIP file.

The core specification of this is in ODF 1.2 Part 1, section 4.2.  That 
would be page 100 in this PDF:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/cd05/OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part1.pdf

Also note Chapter 6 of ODF 1.3 Part 3:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/cd05/OpenDocument-v1.2-cd05-part3.pdf

Note also that we'll also soon be starting up on "ODF-Next" planning. That 
would be the place to sync up with RDFa 1.1, etc.  But if anyone does have 
comments on the support that we do have already in ODF 1.2, such comments 
are more than welcome, and can be submitted to the OASIS ODF TC via the 
process described here:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=office


==== Rob's Personal Observations ====

On the implementation front, I'd point to KOffice as a good example of 
some interesting initial work, where they use RDF/XML to store FOAF and 
iCal info in ODF documents.  A blog post/video on what they did is here:  
http://monkeyiq.blogspot.com/2010/01/koffice-rdf-who-what-when-where.html

OpenOffice.org exposes RDF programmatically, as described here:

http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/OfficeDev/RDF_metadata

One should be able to implement specific uses cases by writing an 
OpenOffice plugin.

I'd expect that other OO-derived editors (Symphony, GoOO, etc.) would also 
be able to build upon that support.

I think we have enough in ODF now to do some interesting things.  But the 
next step is for the implementors to take.   All the other enhancements in 
ODF 1.2 came at the behest of implementors who often had already 
implemented a particular feature.  In other words implementation lead 
specification.  RDFa and RDF/XML were different, in that they were added 
more on speculation, that surely this stuff is important, and having a 
strong metadata link between office documents and web documents will be 
critical in the future.  The formats may be different, but there should be 
one interoperable world of linked metadata.  We now need to figure out 
what works best in practice, what works in terms of an end-user editing 
experience, what works for accessibility, etc. 

Also, I think we need some killer applications of metadata in the office 
editor world.  Many customers have a fear of metadata.  They have been 
frightened by data leakage news stories and think that metadata is 
something that you should always strip and remove from your documents, at 
all costs.  We need to demonstrate the compelling value of metadata that 
makes them overcome their initial reluctance.  Show them a good hybrid web 
pages/ documents mashup and I think the scales will fall from their eyes.


Regards,
 
Rob Weir
Co-Chair, OASIS ODF TC
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 17:48:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 28 July 2010 17:48:34 GMT