W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > February 2010

Re: Does RDFa processing recurse into content:encoded?

From: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:36:00 +0000
Cc: Public RDFa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Message-id: <9160421C-9406-4B9D-93B7-32AA3F50B690@mac.com>
To: Stephane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>

On 8 Feb 2010, at 21:01, Stephane Corlosquet wrote:

> I think this use case would make a good candidate for the next version of
> RDFa.
> Steph.

As it stands I'm not sure this is a 'use case' because it doesn't explain why you want to enclose the body with a content:encoded property. You could, for example, point to it:

<body id="body" rel="content:body" resource="#body">

And if you want an independent record of the original html applications can retrieve that and stuff it in a literal.

Convince me and I'll add it to my parser ;-)

Received on Monday, 8 February 2010 21:36:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:05 UTC