W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > April 2010

Re: rdf:XMLLiteral and the RDF namespace

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:10:19 +0100
Message-ID: <l2r640dd5061004281510w75eaaecfm517bea39ab90bc34@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: "Hondros, Constantine" <Constantine.Hondros@wolterskluwer.com>, "public-rdfa@w3.org" <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Yes, that's right.

But now that RDFa 1.1 has a more cohesive story about about CURIEs and
tokens being applied consistently across all of our attributes, we
should consider creating an 'xmlliteral' token to sit alongside
'next', 'prev', 'license', etc.

It would save a lot of hassle.

:)

Mark

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:07:40 +0200
> "Hondros, Constantine" <Constantine.Hondros@wolterskluwer.com> wrote:
>
>> 1) the RDF prefix and namespace should be obligatory if the datatype
>> rdf:XMLLiteral is used
>
> Yes, this is the case. @datatype is a CURIE, so you must define the
> CURIE prefix. The "rdf:" prefix is nothing special in this regard.
>
> Test 0094 in the RDFa test suite is relevant here.
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:11:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:06 UTC