Re: P3P in RDFa?

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:17:57 +0100, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> On 29/1/09 11:57, Steven Pemberton wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:56:52 +0100, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>  
>> wrote:
>>> This is wf XHTML but somehow the little bit of RDFa I've tried writing
>>> (from memory) there isn't parsing with raptor/librdfa. I don't have
>>> time to experiment today so thought I'd throw this out for
>>> consideration in its current form. Help very much welcomed.
>>
>> Looks like you got your xmlns: prefixes wrong (late night hacking? :-)  
>> ):
>
> Pre-coffee hacking. But it goes to show how this Web thing will Never  
> Work, I guess. Wishing for more helpful parser error messages someday -  
> that would make all the difference.

You could always have tried the W3C validator ;-) It would have told you.

> I guess to be really plausible it will need wizard-based  
> editor/authoring tools, but I'm sure such things existed at one point  
> for P3P. In fact I know they do, I'm just not sure which is the best one  
> to build off - can any P3P experts speak up here?

XSLT?

> Maybe this contact stuff could even be another namespace, I'm not sure  
> if there's a need for it to be all in the P3P vocab these days.

Yes, that was what I was thinking. No need to duplicate all this stuff in  
P3P. Let P3P just be the place for the truly privacy-oriented bits.

Steven