W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > April 2009

Re: FYI: Slideshare is using RDFa....

From: Mani Kumar <mani@slideshare.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:40:45 +0530
Message-ID: <49E63F45.9010305@slideshare.com>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
CC: public-rdfa@w3.org
Mr. Adida:

Thank you for you valuable suggestions. Actually we have added the RDFa 
markup in a hurry for Yahoo!'s SearchMonkey. We'll be cleaning it up soon.

And yes, even we were thinking of having RDFa markup in our embed code. 
But the question is what benefit it brings if have RDFa in embed code, 
while we are making embed code more heavier with more markup?

Thanks!
Mani

Ben Adida wrote:
> Mani,
>
> Great to see you guys tweaking your RDFa!
>
> As you're doing that, I recommend:
>
> 1) putting the RDFa markup in the page content, so you're reusing
> existing markup rather than copying the data in the HEAD, and
>
> 2) adding RDFa to the "share" markup that you allow others to embed in
> their sites, so that their embedding of the slides also carries the
> structured data along with it.
>
> If you need any specific help with that, please don't hesitate to ask!
>
> -Ben
>
> Mani Kumar wrote:
>   
>> Hello Manu, Martin:
>>
>> myself "mani kumar" a SlideShare engineer.
>>
>> We have recently added RDFa to our slideview pages. And yes we are not
>> using RDFa document type declaration.
>>
>> Please let us know what we should add for document type declaration.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Mani Kumar
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>   
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 20:11:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:03 UTC