On 15 Apr 2009, at 19:01, Rich Schumacher wrote: > I was wondering if there were any implications with using RDFa in a > rel attribute along with other relationships. For instance, are > there any problems with the markup below? > > <a href="http://example.com" rel="dc:source blah">Example</a> No, that's perfectly OK. > Would the fact that "blah" is not a valid rel value cause any > errors with RDFa parsing? RDFa parsers are supposed to ignore tokens that they don't recognise in rel, rev, property, datatype and typeof. > I only ask this because when I run the Get N3 RDFa bookmarklet it > extracts the following: > > <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/source blah> <http://example.com> ; That would be a bug then. > Whereas using a valid rel attribute would result in the following: > > <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/source xhtml:alternate> <http:// > exmaple.com/alternate> ; That doesn't look right either. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 19:50:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:03 UTC