W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > April 2009

Re: advice on choosing RDF URI References (slightly off topic)

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:33:37 +0100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Public RDFa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C5FCF611.36E1%michael.hausenblas@deri.org>

Julian,

Not sure if I understand you 100%, but did you check out [1] already?

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/


> From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:45:40 +0200
> To: Public RDFa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
> Subject: advice on choosing RDF URI References (slightly off topic)
> Resent-From: Public RDFa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:46:28 +0000
> 
> Hi,
> 
> (sorry for the slightly off-topic mail, but I'm pretty somebody can help
> me over here...)
> 
> Is there a W3C document that gives advice on how to choose an RDF URI
> Reference, given the fact that many of them can not be expressed as
> QNames (*)? (Clarifying: I'm not looking for the advice itself, but a
> W3C document I could point to...)
> 
> BR, Julian
> 
> (*) And yes, I realize that this is not a problem with CURIEs.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 4 April 2009 10:34:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:03 UTC