W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > September 2008

Re: A vocabulary discussion for Digg

From: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:10:43 +0200
Message-ID: <52bd7c3d0809162310n1996c560mfeee4b485c68aedf@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: public-rdfa@w3.org, "Steve Williams" <sbw@digg.com>

Dear Folks,

In the past and also for my personal study I made an RDF extractor for
digg, If I remember good was something like:

DC for the base:
dc:title (for title), dc:description (for description), dc:subject
(categories),  dc:publisher (is for digg.com), dc:creator (the user)

SKOS (basic use) for categories:
 - skos:Concept for the categories (with
skos:broader/skos:narrower)... on the wide this creates a nice tree

FOAF for people:
- foaf:Person for people involved with foaf:maker for who wrote this
and a foaf:depiction for his/her avatar (and an holds account) for
his/her digg user page

As Manu already said SIOC whould be nice for community

..a good start for reflection sould be
xmlns:digg="http://digg.com/docs/diggrss/"

Cheers,

Simone



On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>
> Ben Adida wrote:
>> We need to kick-start this RDFa users' mailing list, and what better way
>> to do it than by helping one of our early adopters, Digg!
>
> Digg is responsible for consuming at least an hour of my productivity
> per day. I worry about how much more of my time is going to be lost to
> Digg now that you're going to have more semantic data to aid in feeding
> my addiction! :)
>
>> Steve Williams, cc'ed, is working on adding more RDFa to Digg. He's
>> exploring possible vocabularies to use for # of diggs, thumbnails, etc..
>> He may be interested in creating a new vocab for social media, but he's
>> interested in reuse first (go Steve/Digg!)
>
> Awesome that you're interested in re-use Steve - hope you (and some of
> your engineers) will join the public RDFa mailing list (if you haven't
> already). The vocabulary that comes to mind first is, of course, SIOC:
>
> http://sioc-project.org/ontology
>
> By using SIOC, you'll probably also end up using Dublin Core and FOAF:
>
> Dublin Core:
> http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/
>
> FOAF:
> http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
>
> It would allow Digg to mark up people, categories (Technology, Politics,
> Science, etc.), roles (poster, commenter, etc.), avatars (images),
> groups, friends, posts, comments, comment order, number of comments, etc.
>
> We might want to start with a typical Digg story page (pre-existing
> story) and work our way up from there. Do you have a particular section
> of the site that you'd want to focus on first? A basic XHTML example
> that you're interested in marking up?
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Bitmunk 3.0 Website Launches
> http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/07/03/bitmunk-3-website-launches
>
>



-- 
Simone Onofri
http://www.siatec.net/
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 06:11:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 17 September 2008 06:11:19 GMT