Re: PER-s for RDFa 1.1

Great. I think we can aim at a publication for the 11th of December, that is almost two weeks.

Manu, as I said, I am happy to make the minor editings that I listed, just give me a nod. To be clear, that would mean I can take care of RDFa Lite, HTML+RDFa and, of course, the Primer (that one is already done), with Shane taking care of Core and XHTML+RDFa (at the minimum all cross references should be up-to-date).

Ivan



> On 28 Nov 2014, at 24:57 , Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
> 
> I imagine I could find some cycles to do this.  There might also be a couple of minor DTD and XML Schema things that need fixing.  Let me check my notes.
> 
> On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 27 Nov 2014, at 11:55 , Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > Manu, Ralph, Shane,
> >
> > we have a pending issue that we are now in position to close. Per[1] we had to pending issues in HTML+RDFa, waiting for the HTML5
> 
> to -> two :-)
> 
> > and the RDF1.1 recommendations to be published. This is now done. This means that we would have re-publish the HTML+RDFa1.1 document with following actions:
> >
> > - remove the note in the Status section of [1]
> > - in section 3.1 step 9 the last sentence should be removed; @datetime is now normative
> > - in section 3.1 step 11 the last sentence should simply say: "This feature is non-normative" (Alas!, due to the delay of DOM3, the HTML datatype is not normative in RDF1.1 Concepts[2]...)
> 
> Additional, minor things:
> 
> - the reference to HTML5 should be updated to Rec
> - The RDF concepts and Turtle references should become normative and updated.
> - Actually I do not know what the XHTML+RDFa1.1 reference is as an informal and referring to the PER an not the Rec; I think that was an oversight at the final publication step. Anyway, that should be updated as well.
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> >
> > This is the minimum that we should do, leading to a PER transition request, and a republication of [1] as an (Edited) Recommendation. Once that done, the RDFa WG[3] should be formally closed.
> >
> > However, we should probably do a bit more. The errata document for RDFa[4] also contains some minor errors. All of them are, as far as I can see, editorial. Caveat: that means we have to republish (as PER-s) not only HTML+RDFa, but RDFa Lite, RDFa Core, and XHTML+RDFa. Plus some error in the RDFa Primer note. Ie, the whole lot.
> >
> > I think we should do this asap and close the RDFa 1.1 group. If we all agree, we may be able to issue a formal AC review call for the PER before Xmas; I guess the work required is pretty insignificant. (There is a publication moratorium starting the 19th of December up to the 5th of January.) Manu, Shane, if you have problems generating the new versions for whatever reasons, I can also do these editings myself.
> >
> > Ralph, I presume we can handle everything by email, we do not need a formal transition call for this; we are talking about PER-s.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-html-rdfa-20130822/
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/
> > [4] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/errata.html
> >
> > ----
> > Ivan Herman, W3C
> > Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> > mobile: +31-641044153
> > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704