- From: Alex Miłowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 22:38:46 -0700
- To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 2, 2014, Alex Miłowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: >> >> I don't see any problem with XML has a host language. There are >> plenty of XML vocabularies that will benefit from RDFa. In fact, RDFa >> is being added to DocBook and will be valid DocBook for version 5.1. > > > It's not the XML is a bad host language, but that this test isn't setup to > run in XML mode. It could be if @lang were changed to &xml:lang, but that > may not be the point if the test. Easiest thing would be to just remove XML > from the set if host languages for this particular test in the test > manifest. > OK. I get what you are saying now. My apologies. >> >> Meanwhile, the test seems just incorrect. The only language attribute >> available that is universally recognized is xml:lang. >> >> The simple solution is to correct the input document in the test case. > > > Either way, perhaps the test author can chime in with specifically what the > purpose of the test is. Fair enough. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 05:39:13 UTC