- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 21:23:30 -0400
- To: Alex Miłowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnF9_rgxTrME39M+0UUru1T73abYtTSTC8H9p+1eZZ5Afw@mail.gmail.com>
https://github.com/rdfa/rdfa-website/pull/43/files looks good? On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote: > Awesome! I'll get that fixed then. > > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Alex Miłowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: > >> Sorry, didn't see this till now. >> >> For an XML-oriented processor, the lang="en" attribute would just be >> ignored. Having both would be just fine for my processor. I can't >> imagine it hurting others because they aren't suppose to recognize >> anything other than the xml:lang attribute. >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet >> <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3 July 2014 06:19, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Wednesday, July 2, 2014, Alex Miłowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I don't see any problem with XML has a host language. There are >> >> >> plenty of XML vocabularies that will benefit from RDFa. In fact, >> RDFa >> >> >> is being added to DocBook and will be valid DocBook for version 5.1. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > It's not the XML is a bad host language, but that this test isn't >> setup >> >> > to >> >> > run in XML mode. It could be if @lang were changed to &xml:lang, but >> >> > that >> >> > may not be the point if the test. Easiest thing would be to just >> remove >> >> > XML >> >> > from the set if host languages for this particular test in the test >> >> > manifest. >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Meanwhile, the test seems just incorrect. The only language >> attribute >> >> >> available that is universally recognized is xml:lang. >> >> >> >> >> >> The simple solution is to correct the input document in the test >> case. >> >> > >> >> > Either way, perhaps the test author can chime in with specifically >> what >> >> > the >> >> > purpose of the test is. >> >> >> >> I did not write that particular test (scor did), but it is related to >> >> tests I did write (0330 and 0331). The original discussion was at >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Apr/0012.html. >> >> >> >> These were created for the web page >> >> http://reecedunn.co.uk/espeak-for-android (HTML5 page) for which the >> >> rdf/rdfa ruby module incorrectly extracted the: >> >> >> >> <li content='af' datatype='dct:RFC5646' >> >> property='s:countriesSupported'>Afrikaans</li> >> >> >> >> metadata as the page had <html lang="en"> declared at the top (i.e. it >> >> used the lang property, not the datatype property as other tools did). >> >> >> >> I am happy for: >> >> >> >> 1. these tests to be restricted to the HTML (and possibly the XHTML >> >> tests); >> >> 2. a new set of tests based on 0330-0332 using xml:lang instead. >> > >> > >> > Would having the polyglot notation with both lang="en" and xml:lang="en" >> > solve the problems here? or would lang="en" still make XML unhappy? >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> NOTE: The 0332 test references 7.5 step 11 in the specification. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Reece >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Steph. >> >> >> >> -- >> --Alex Milowski >> "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of >> the >> inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language >> considered." >> >> Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics >> >> > > > -- > Steph. > -- Steph.
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2014 01:23:57 UTC