Re: HTML+RDFa 1.1 Proposed Recommendation draft ready

I *note* that the *notes* in this document have different styling than the
notes in the PERs.  Should we change the other documents to match this
style?  Where does this style come from?  I thought we were just using
ReSpec?


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Manu,
>
> tiny things
>
> - in the change section you should also say that the property copying,
> that was
> a feature at risk in the LC, is now integral part of the document
> - to avoid misunderstanding at a cursory read, let us use [RDF11-CONCEPTS]
> for
> the reference to RDF 1.1
>
> Talk to you soon
>
> Ivan
>
> Manu Sporny wrote:
> > I have addressed all known editorial comments for the HTML+RDFa 1.1
> > specification and prepared a Proposed Recommendation draft here:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2013/PR-html-rdfa-20130625/
> >
> > There is only one item related to the draft that we need to discuss
> > (additional RDFa Processing Rule #8).
> >
> > We have passed the plan on dealing with the two non-normative features
> > by W3C Management and there seems to be agreement on the approach. There
> > are no known issues at this point that would prevent the document from
> > going to REC, so if you know of any, now would be the time to speak up.
> :)
> >
> > The plan is to request transition to PR during the call tomorrow.
> >
> > -- manu
> >
>
> --
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>



-- 
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.