- From: Sebastian Heath <sebastian.heath@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 22:06:55 -0400
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
IN the list of people who provided feedback I see "Thomas Adamich" and "Tom Adamich". Is that correct? If not, are there other repeats I've missed? -Sebastian On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > I have addressed all known editorial comments for the HTML+RDFa 1.1 > specification and prepared a Proposed Recommendation draft here: > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2013/PR-html-rdfa-20130625/ > > There is only one item related to the draft that we need to discuss > (additional RDFa Processing Rule #8). > > We have passed the plan on dealing with the two non-normative features > by W3C Management and there seems to be agreement on the approach. There > are no known issues at this point that would prevent the document from > going to REC, so if you know of any, now would be the time to speak up. :) > > The plan is to request transition to PR during the call tomorrow. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch > http://blog.meritora.com/launch/ >
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 02:07:25 UTC