- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:13:33 -0700
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Gregg Kellogg gregg@greggkellogg.net On Mar 17, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > HTML+RDFa 1.1 introduces a new feature called Property Copying which > provides equivalent functionality to Microdata's @itemref feature. The > feature was marked as at-risk when we entered Last Call in February. The > WG needs to decide if we're going to continue to keep this feature, or > remove it from the specification. There was no feedback asking the WG to > remove the feature. The WG unanimously polled[1] in favor of adding the > feature to the specification. > > PROPOSAL: Keep the Property Copying feature in the HTML+RDFa 1.1 > specification. > > All WG members, please +1/-1/+0 the proposal above. +1 Gregg > -- manu > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2013-01-17#resolution_1 > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals > http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/ >
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 00:14:04 UTC