- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:00:22 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 03/14/2013 03:51 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > I have looked at the status section of the draft, I made a tiny > change and added a sentence. Thanks. I've applied your changes. > I think we can go to Ralph & Thomas with this... Great, I'll send an e-mail out asking if there are any objections from the rest of the WG in proceeding w/o going through a 2nd Last Call. > I also see that you removed the 'at risk' aspect of property > copying. I personally agree with this, but that still requires a WG > decision:-)... B.t.w., I have asked DanBri lately for a google > comment on specifically this feature. You're right. I'll send a straw-poll out right after this to collect +1s/-1s from the group. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 00:00:56 UTC