Re: Using the W3C publication process vocabulary

Alexandre Bertails wrote:
> On 06/23/2013 07:27 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> The RDF file that are used internally usually use the 'rec' prefix for this one.
>> But, well, *shrug*, that is not a strong argument...
> 
> Why not "tr:" then?

Works for me, too.

Ivan

> 
> Alexandre.
> 
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>> Shane McCarron wrote:
>>> In order to enhance the RDFa support in ReSpec, I am going to include an
>>> indication of the specification status using the vocabulary
>>> at http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54 - see http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.n3
>>> if you want to view one version.
>>>
>>> My plan is to use the prefix 'w3p' for this unless there is an existing commonly
>>> used prefix for this vocabulary.  If anyone has an opinion on this, please don't
>>> hesitate to chime in.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Shane P. McCarron
>>> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me

Received on Sunday, 23 June 2013 12:50:19 UTC