- From: Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:38:40 +0530
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
>> Now: >> In order for RDFa Processors to conform to this specification, they must >> use the mechanism described in The lang and xml:lang attributes section >> of the ... >> Suggestion: >> In order to conform to this specification, RDFa processors must use the >> mechanism described in *section* The lang and xml:lang attributes of >> the ... >> Note: >> I wrote processor in small caps, it is written RDFa Processor in several >> instances. Since it is used as a general description not as a name, I >> would prefer small caps. > > Fixed. > >> And position of section changed. > > Did you propose moving this section? That wasn't clear. I changed the position of the word 'section' in the sentence, I wouldn't dare to propose to move your sections. ;-) It is the same case in many parts of the LC, first: in 'the lang and xml:lang attributes', then the word section, leads to: in the lang and xml:lang attributes section I would write in most cases: in section ' the lang and xml:lang attributes' same somewhere in 3.4: in the 'Serializing XHTML Fragments' section I would write: in section 'Serializing XHTML Fragments' If there is a link involved, it is written like: Section 7.5: Sequence That sounds and looks nice. I would make this across the spec 'same same', but that might be some personal taste, not back breaking if it stays like this. Stefan
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:09:28 UTC